The Special Relationship has seen better days



The chaos following the Brexit vote has dominated the British and world press in the month since the referendum.  Some have called it the greatest blunder by the UK since the invasion of Suez 60 years ago.  It will probably be considered one of the most significant events in the early twenty-first century, affecting the economies and politics of Europe and by extension the world for years to come.  

 The Brexit vote has overshadowed the release of the Chilcot Report, the seven year study of the UK's government leading up to, during, and following the invasion of Iraq in 2003.  The report's findings are somewhat scathing regarding the conduct of the governments of the UK and the US in the rationale, planning, execution, and follow up of the invasion of Iraq, another sovereign state which, though not a virtuous nation by any measure, was not at war with either state.  The invasion has had consequences in the Middle East, Africa, and Europe that will last for decades.  Tony Blair and George Bush are likely somewhat relieved that the political attention of their countries has been drawn to other matters, Brexit and Donald Trump, instead of the damning conclusions of the Chilcot report.

When considering a war with Iraq, Bush and Blair probably imagined they would go down in history as the FDR and Churchill of our age, a team who sought to vanquish the evil of our time as their predecessors defeated the evil of their time, a gleaming example of the ultimate special relationship between the two nations.  They considered the armies and oppression by Saddam Hussein to be threats similar to the armies and oppression of Adolf Hitler.  In both cases, the special relationship between the US and the UK vanquished their enemies of the moment.  
The Special Relationship: 1943
The Special Relationship: 2003
It's worth considering how the victories played out for the UK and the US.  A dozen years after FDR and Churchill met in Casablanca to plan the Allied victory over the Axis powers, the British empire was crumbling as colonies were granted their independence, challenging the whole structure of the British economy.  A dozen years after Bush and Blair crafted the invasion of Iraq, the UK, whose government and economy were on unsteady ground from the squandering political and financial capital on years of war, recession, and austerity, voted itself out of the European Union and has years of likely even greater instability and economic hardship to look forward to.

The situation in the US after the two partnerships of war is a study in contrasts.  A dozen years after WWII, the US was in many respects the envy and leader of the world, with a vibrant economy gradually providing opportunity to all, on the verge of a long overdue expansion of rights and opportunity to long oppressed and ignored members of society--blacks and women.  On the other hand, a dozen years after invading Iraq, the US struggles to recover completely from a recession made worse by the expenditures and debt incurred by the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.  The economic hardship and increasing inequality exacerbated by the waste of political and financial capital on war rather than the people of the US has led to a horrid flirtation with a brash demagogue as a major political party's presidential candidate.

FDR and Churchill's victory made the world a better place, opening the doors to freedom for millions and creating international structures to try to prevent devastating world war in the future.  FDR and Churchill are both considered among the most distinguished individuals to lead their nations, with monuments, ships, and buildings around the world named in their honor.  Bush and Blair left their nations with the costs and burdens of continual war and the lost opportunity to make the lives of all their citizens better.  It will take a drastic reevaluation of their legacies to warrant future monuments in their honor.  The Special Relationship has truly seen better days.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Non-Profit, the Tanning Booth, and the Mercedes-Benz.

Image
No, this is not an attempt to parody C.S. Lewis by drawing together three disparate items into an allegorical children's story about sacrifice.  I work for non-profits, the first of the items above, and like all people and organizations, non-profits have to file a tax return.  For a 501(c)(3), the tax return is the IRS Form 990, in which the organization reports its income, expenses, and activities for the year.  Our auditor draws up our Form 990 as part of the annual audit. I review the form to make certain all of our answers make sense, the numbers are reported correctly, and that all the board members' names are spelled correctly.  This year, I noticed an interesting question: Tanning Booths?  Non-profits?  A 501(c)(3) is tax-exempt because it carries out worthwhile artistic, educational, or social programs.  I know there are a lot of strange things going on in creating the tax code.  But how do tanning booths mix with most non-profits?  Can you see a tanning boot
Read more

Flipping toy soldiers on ebay--a good haul

Image
Today people buy and then resell houses, cars, and other items, a process commonly called flipping.  Some of us "flip" toys, including my former student and master flipper Will .  He hits garage sales and estate sales and sells his finds on his own website .   I just cruise ebay while watching tv.  I just had a great flip of toys I found on ebay.  I will pay homage to the master toy-flipper with this post. Two weeks ago I found a bunch of toy soldiers and vehicles for 18.88 including shipping.  It was described by the seller as "Large Lot of Old Junk Military Men Landscape & Vehicle Toys Small and Bigger sizes"   and the photograph shows a bunch of soldiers of different sizes, globs of plastic, and pile of plastic pieces.   Like a prospector in the Klondike, I saw gold in that pile.   I was happy it was Buy it Now on ebay so I didn't have to bid against other prospectors.  I've sold some of it in separate lots.   Let's see what sold. In the sixties a
Read more

Old Dinky toy tank

Image
A couple months ago, I bought a toy that's over 70 years old on ebay.  It's a metal toy model of a tank the British army used between the two world wars.  The raised lettering on the bottom reads "Dinky Toys  Made in Britain."  The turret turns around and the tracks made of small chains move, so that you can move the tank on the ground or a table. It definitely looks like something from a different time.  The body of the vehicle has lots of rivets and rigid shapes that recalls the appearance of a steamship.  Which would make sense as the tank was thought of as a land battleship, which would stand at the edge of a battlefield and engage enemy  land battleships while smaller tanks raced around the battlefield.  Its turret resembles that of a battleship, while two guns extending from the sides of the chassis that resemble the secondary guns of a battleship for defending against smaller ships.  It was a familiar vision to Britain after decades as a supreme sea power,
Read more